Guideline 4.2 minimum functionality rejection?
Minimum-functionality rejections need proof that the app has enough native utility, original value, and working flows for reviewers to test.
Plan 4.2 fixes | See sample report
Independent App Review readiness analysis. Not affiliated with Apple Inc. No approval guarantees. Not legal advice.
What this usually means
Check Guideline 4.2 minimum functionality rejection notes for feature depth, usefulness evidence, metadata fit, demo access, and resubmission risk.
Evidence you need
- Temporary reviewer credentials
- Test path
- 2FA status
- Paid-feature unlock notes
- Location or test notes
Fix checklist
- Feature depth
- Native usefulness
- Metadata alignment
- Evidence gaps
- Resubmission sequence
Reviewer reply starter
Dear App Review Team, Thank you for reviewing our app. We reviewed the Guideline 4.2 minimum functionality rejection evidence and updated the relevant app flow before resubmission. Reviewer access and evidence path: [add verified details] Thank you.